March 11, 2024

OneLogin vs. Okta (2024): Which IAM Solution Is Better?

OneLogin vs. Okta: Comparison

OneLogin and Okta are enterprise-grade IAM platforms offering security products that customers can mix-and-match to create a customized solution.

Features	OneLogin	Okta
Bundled products	Yes	No
Single Sign-On (SSO)	Yes	Yes
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)	Yes	Yes
Directory Synchronization	Yes	Yes
Identity Lifecycle Management	Yes	Yes
Testing Sandbox	Yes	No
User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)	Yes	Yes
No-Code Automation	Yes	Yes
API Access Management	No	Yes

Learn more about IAM in our free PDF: The 10 Universal Truths of Identity and Access Management

1
ManageEngine Desktop Central

Any Company Size
Any Company Size

Features

Activity Monitoring, Antivirus, Dashboard, and more

OneLogin and Okta pricing

OneLogin offers two bundled plans as well as a la carte pricing. OneLogin’s Advanced plan includes SSO, advanced directory synchronization and MFA for $4 per user per month. The Professional plan adds identity lifecycle management and HR-driven identity management for $8/user/month. Individual workforce IAM features range from $2-$5 per user per month, with the exception of advanced features like the testing sandbox that require a custom sales quote.

Okta’s products are only available individually. The pricing for each feature varies; for example, basic SSO is $2 per user per month, but adaptive SSO is $5 per user per month. Okta has a $1,500 annual contract minimum, with volume discounts for Enterprise clients with more than 5,000 users.

Feature comparison: OneLogin vs. Okta

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Both OneLogin and Okta offer SSO for on-premises and cloud-based applications, as well as endpoint devices like laptops and mobile phones. For an additional $3/user/month, Okta also offers adaptive SSO that analyzes the risk of a login request based on context, such as the device’s location.

Figure A: A screenshot of the Okta Single Sign-On portal. Image: Okta

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

OneLogin and Okta both have MFA products for enterprise applications, endpoint devices and the cloud. OneLogin’s basic MFA integrates with biometric authenticators (such as Hello World on PCs and Touch ID on Macs) for added protection, whereas Okta offers this functionality as a separate product (SmartFactor Authentication™). Okta’s MFA includes adaptive access policies that assess contextual risk factors like location and user behavior. OneLogin also offers adaptive MFA with machine learning risk analysis, but it’s an additional $5/user/month.

Directory Synchronization

Both OneLogin and Okta offer directory synchronization products that pull in identity and policy information from Active Directory and other sources, providing a centralized control panel to simplify management across the enterprise. OneLogin’s product is called Advanced Directory, and Okta’s is Universal Directory.

Identity Lifecycle Management

OneLogin and Okta both provide identity lifecycle management services that allow you to automatically provision, change and de-provision accounts.

Testing Sandbox

OneLogin has a tool called OneLogin Sandbox that provides a safe staging environment for you to test new IAM features and configurations before deploying them to production. Okta does not offer this feature.

User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Both OneLogin and Okta offer UEBA technology that uses artificial intelligence to analyze account behavior on the network to identify anomalies and threats. OneLogin’s Vigilance AI™ Threat Engine is built into their SmartFactor Authentication product; Okta expects their Identity Threat Protection with Okta AI product to be available in Early Access in the first half of 2024.

No-Code Automation

OneLogin offers multiple avenues for no-code workflow automation: its identity lifecycle management and HR-driven identity products come with built-in automation capabilities, while its Smart Hooks feature allows you to build custom workflows and integrations via APIs. The Okta Workflows product provides a no-code interface to create automated identity-based processes using pre-built templates or custom integrations.

API Access Management

Okta has an API access management tool that streamlines API onboarding, integration and security with a unified, intuitive control panel. OneLogin does not offer API access management functionality.

OneLogin pros and cons

Pros of OneLogin

Provides pricing bundles and a la carte features with no minimums.
Base product supports biometric integrations and custom workflow automation.
Offers a testing sandbox to safely validate new features and configurations.

Cons of OneLogin

Adaptive MFA costs extra.
Does not provide API access management.

Okta pros and cons

Pros of Okta

MFA product includes contextual access policies.
Provides an API access management tool.
Offers an intuitive no-code identity automation platform.

Cons of Product 2

Has a $1,500 annual contract minimum.
UEBA is not available yet.

Methodology

I began my comparison of these two products by thoroughly reviewing the OneLogin and Okta websites to gain a basic understanding of the capabilities and features offered. Then, I downloaded the free trials to evaluate the ease of use of individual features and tools. I also analyzed reviews from Gartner Peer Insights and other trusted sources to learn how real customers use the products and which features factor most heavily into their purchasing decisions.

Download our PDF to learn about The Future of Identity and Access Management.

Should your organization use OneLogin or Okta?

OneLogin and Okta both deliver advanced identity and access management (IAM) capabilities for enterprises. Their individual products have similar pricing, but OneLogin offers bundles and no annual minimums, making it a better option for companies that don’t anticipate spending more than $1,500 per year on their IAM platform. Both platforms offer many of the same features, with some exceptions, such as OneLogin’s testing sandbox and Okta’s API access management tool. Ultimately, the decision will hinge on your organization’s size, requirements and unique security risk profile.

Source link

OneLogin vs. Okta (2024): Which IAM Solution Is Better? Read More »

Modernizing pentesting: strategies for leisure and hospitality

The unique cybersecurity challenges of the leisure and hospitality sector

Travel and leisure organizations can protect customer data through regular security testing, ensuring family trips are secure in all respects.

The digital landscape is rapidly changing the leisure and hospitality industry as IoT devices and interconnected systems are being widely implemented. Examples include Point of Sale (POS) payment systems, smart locks, and in-room entertainment systems, which improve both guest satisfaction and operational efficiency. However, this also increases the risk of cyber threats, as the industry’s attack surface expands.

One of the biggest cybersecurity challenges for the leisure and hospitality industry is the handling of sensitive guest data. Personal information, credit card details, and travel itineraries are all valuable targets for cybercriminals. A data breach can not only damage a company’s reputation but also result in financial losses and legal liabilities.

Another challenge is the industry’s reliance on legacy systems and outdated software. Many hotels and hospitality businesses still operate on old IT infrastructure that may not have been designed with modern security threats in mind. These systems are often vulnerable to exploits and may not receive regular security updates, making them easy targets for attackers.

Finally, the distributed nature of the industry, with multiple locations and remote access points, complicates the implementation of consistent security measures. Ensuring that all properties and systems are adequately protected can be a significant challenge, especially for large hotel chains or hospitality groups.

Pentesting: A critical tool for cyber resilience

Pentesting has become widely recognized as a key factor in enhancing cyber resilience for the leisure and hospitality industry. This proactive approach involves simulating cyberattacks to uncover vulnerabilities before malicious actors can exploit them. By identifying and addressing these weaknesses, businesses can significantly reduce the risk of data breaches, financial losses, and reputational damage.

Leisure and hospitality organizations should prioritize key areas to test, such as:

Guest data management systems
Payment processing systems
Access control mechanisms.

Given the increasing reliance on IoT devices and interconnected systems, testing their security becomes paramount to preventing cybercriminals from exploiting these entry points.

Regularly conducting penetration testing enables organizations to maintain compliance with industry regulations and standards like PCI DSS and GDPR. This not only ensures adherence to legal requirements but also fosters trust among customers and partners. In turn, this can translate into increased revenue and sustained success in a competitive market.

5 limitations of pentesting for leisure and hospitality businesses

Pentesting, while important, has limitations for leisure and hospitality organizations. To make informed decisions and enhance their security, its important that businesses acknowledge and address these. Here are five key limitations:

Limited scope: Pentesting focuses on specific systems, leaving potential blind spots in the interconnected infrastructure of the leisure and hospitality industry.
Time constraints: The fast-paced nature of the industry makes it challenging to conduct regular pentests, leaving organizations vulnerable to emerging threats.
Lack of real-world simulation: Conducting pentesting in controlled environments might not fully capture the real-world challenges faced in the industry. This can create a false sense of security.
Human error and bias: Testers can overlook vulnerabilities or fail to consider unconventional attack vectors, introducing subjectivity and inconsistency in results.
Incomplete remediation: Pentesting identifies vulnerabilities, but organizations may struggle to promptly address them, leaving a window of opportunity for attackers.

To overcome these limitations, organizations should complement pentesting with evolving security testing techniques to build a robust security posture.

Evolving security testing techniques for the leisure and hospitality industry

One notable evolvement in security testing for leisure and hospitality companies is the implementation of crowdsourced pentesting. This is where organizations engage a community of ethical hackers to identify vulnerabilities from diverse perspectives. This approach complements traditional pentesting methods by leveraging the expertise of a broader pool of security professionals. You can kickstart this approach through Intigriti’s Hybrid Pentest solution.

Furthermore, the industry is embracing continuous pentesting, recognizing the dynamic nature of cyber threats. An example of this is bug bounty programs. This approach involves ongoing testing throughout the year, rather than relying solely on periodic assessments. Continuous pentesting ensures that organizations remain vigilant against emerging vulnerabilities and can promptly address any security gaps.

Regardless of the chosen approach, implementing a robust patch management system is crucial for organizations. Having one in place will ensure timely installation of security updates for their software and systems.

Achieving cyber resilience through continuous security testing

Regularly conducting vulnerability assessments and penetration tests is crucial for identifying potential security gaps. Finding these issues promptly also empowers security teams to implement timely remediation measures. By adopting these continuous security testing practices, the leisure and hospitality industry can enhance its overall cyber resilience.

To learn more about bug bounty programs and pentesting for financial services, get in touch